This is a mirror of the ECAS 4 conference website on http://www.nai.uu.se/

Search result

Nothing to search for

No hits

Type one or more search terms into the search box and click on the search button.

The search engine does not distinguish between lowercase and uppercase letters.

A results page will be produced: a list of web pages related to your search terms, with the most relevant page appearing first, then the next, and so on.

Boolean operators
The operator AND is set as default between words. You can combine several words or phrases by using the logical operators ‘OR’ and ‘AND’.

You can also use plus or minus marks for including or excluding words (see below).

Ranking
The more of the words that are present in the page, the higher is the score.

If words appear in the same order as in your query, and close to each other, the score of the document gets high.

Phrase Search
Use quotation marks to compound phrases. If you wish to search for a phrase, you write text inside “…”quotation marks.

Eg. "African studies"

Truncation
Use * for truncation of search terms. A search term does not always have to be entered in its complete form. Search terms may be truncated from left or right.

Eg. Tanza* or even *anza*

Prioritizing Words
Plus marks a word as necessary. By preceding a word or a phrase with a plus sign, you tell the search engine that you are only looking for documents that contain that word/phrase.

Eg. +policy +activities

Word Exclusion
Minus marks a word as not wanted. By preceding a word or phrase with a minus sign, you tell the search engine to exclude that word/phrase and only to look for documents that match the rest of the query.

Eg. nordic -africa –institute

Panel 7: “Aid as a Means of Power for Developing States?”

Panel organisers: Perrine Bonvalet and Rozenn Diallo (Centre d'Etude d'Afrique Noire, Sciences-po Bordeaux, France)

Contact: perribo@gmail.com

Recent developments in international discourses emphasize the necessity for states in developing countries to assume leadership in the aid relationship. This new trend illustrates the attempt by donors to reverse the traditional practice of aid, often denounced as an unequal balance of power. Going beyond discourses, this panel aims at analysing what is at stake in this “renewed” state-donor relationship. To this end, it takes the state perspective to investigate the effects of this relationship on its stateness and sovereignty : we would like to shed light on the on-going games played by international and national actors in order to (re)negotiate their positions in the development field. In this aid relationship, are receiving states in practice really at the centre of development policies or are international actors able to retain their leading position in the policy-making process? This panel aims at showing that, beyond discourses on statedonor inequality, international aid can be a means for the state to reinforce its position vis-à-vis international and national actors. Examining how it tries/manages to (re)configure itself through its ties to international aid will be the guiding thread of this panel.

Based on empirical research, this panel will put particular emphasis on aid sectors that attract strong international commitments (AIDS, environment...). Contributions are welcome to focus on the national as well as local level.

Accepted Abstracts

SESSION 1

The Political Dimension of Aid Effectiveness: Assessing the Principle of Ownership

A Negotiated Leadership: The Case of Water Sector Reform in Niger

Aid Relations amid State Fragmentation: Accounting for Disengagement from Administrative Matters in the Democratic Republic of Congo

Ownership for the Taking? Challenges and Possibilities for Rwanda in Taking Ownership

SESSION 2

Scotland and Malawi: Partnership, Knowledge Exchange and the Power Relationship Between Donor and Recipient

Internationalisation of Policymaking and State Power in Mozambique: The Case of the Conservation Sector

Choosing Dependency? AIDS and International Aid in Tanzania

Kabila’s Sino-HIPC bonanza: How Kinshasa’s room for maneuver was maximized in the Sicomines negotiations

Search Help