The African-book industry was always an economic stake for the Western world, raising many questions on structural autonomy, soft power survival and the postcolonial transition. These issues are particularly sensitive in Francophone Africa. Indeed, it is surprising to observe that France set up cultural cooperation with its "almost" former African colonies starting in the late 1950s. By creating a cultural network in Africa, France rather negotiated a transition towards independence, setting a strategical role for French publishers in African educational programs and establishing Paris as a centre for the outreach of African literature. Actually, the independence of the African-book industry remains problematic because it became the arena for growing bilateral and multilateral Western involvement, from the early 1960s. This external influence has never ceased. Furthermore, in the late 1970s, it was strengthened by the pressure of the Bretton-Woods economic institutions that counteracted Unesco's initial will to support autonomous African book development. When the economic crisis appeared in Africa in the 1980s, all those foreign presences met a philanthropic involvement. This charity movement - with Scandinavian, Francophone and US governments and NGOs in the first place - broadcast at that time the false picture of a "book famine" in Africa. Subsequently, it is interesting to observe the 'presence' - i.e. the invisibility - of the African book in the ascending francophone and postcolonial studies from the 1980s to nowadays.

Bibliometric indicators are playing an increasingly important role in applications to grants, promotions, prizes and tenure. This paper provides an overview of the currently used bibliometric indicators and discusses tools and resources available to track and assess research impact. The paper further explores strategies that aim at increasing the visibility of research and at extending the likelihood of an article being cited, discussed or otherwise mentioned in scientific and relevant societal groups. All examples focus on African Studies.

This presentation focuses on social sciences publishing on African topics in both Africa and the North. The paper will introduce a preliminary discussion of a larger project, the aim of which is to assess the achievements of publishing in Africa through a series of case studies of publishing by institutions across West, East and Southern Africa such as CODESRIA, HSRC, OSSREA and some smaller African institutions in terms of postcolonial concepts such as publishing autonomy and control, and regional and international collaboration.

The paper will assess the links between social sciences publishing within and beyond the African continent, in terms of mainstreaming African knowledge in the Western , and more critically in terms of the dominance of Northern journals, and the extraversion of African knowledge. At the same time, there is little support for publishing in the continent itself. I will investigate the trajectory of strategic and funding support for African publishing initiatives, arguing this is currently highly fragmented and of low political priority despite knowledge constituted within African institutions being essential for the health of the study and understanding of the continent.

Focusing on two social science research institutions in post-colonial Mozambique, this article examines the intellectual legacy of the Centro de Estudos Africanos (CEA) in the Mozambique's neoliberal context. This analysis will focus specifically on the scientific work of the Instituto de Estudos Sociais e Económicos (IESE, 2007-2016). The article argues that in order to have a better understanding of the emergence and consolidation of IESE as a critical, state-independent and policy oriented research institution, it is not sufficient to look at the present context of private sector competition, multi-party system, and freedom of expression, but also to something that is directly linked to the Mozambican recent past: the intellectual legacy of the socialist transition period, and more particularly the intellectual legacy of the Marxist CEA (1976-1986). This legacy, in its interaction with the neoliberal context, produced continuities and ruptures. Firstly, it encompassed the passage of human capital from one institution to another. Secondly, the transference of disciplines, theories, methods, practices and "political morality". Thirdly, the consolidation and radicalization of a form of research program that is critical, free from state political ideology, contemporary and oriented towards public policy. Lastly, the growth of deluded intellectuals and the fading of historical, empirical and collective social research.